|
Birth Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution Birth, Marriage, Death in the UK Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
| United States of America |
This article is part of the series:
United States Constitution
|
| Original text of the Constitution |
Preamble
Articles of the Constitution
I ∙ II ∙ III ∙ IV ∙ V ∙ VI ∙ VII
|
| Amendments to the Constitution |
Bill of Rights
I ∙ II ∙ III ∙ IV ∙ V
VI ∙ VII ∙ VIII ∙ IX ∙ X
Subsequent Amendments
XI ∙ XII ∙ XIII ∙ XIV ∙ XV
XVI ∙ XVII ∙ XVIII ∙ XIX ∙ XX
XXI ∙ XXII ∙ XXIII ∙ XXIV ∙ XXV
XXVI ∙ XXVII
|
Other countries · Law Portal
view • talk • edit
|
Amendment XI in the National Archives
The Eleventh Amendment (Amendment XI) of the United States Constitution was passed by the U.S. Congress on March 4, 1794, and was ratified on February 7, 1795. This Amendment deals with each State's sovereign immunity from being sued in federal court by someone of another state or country. This Amendment was adopted in response to, and in order to overrule, the United States Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
Contents
- 1 Text
- 2 Summary
- 3 Proposal and ratification
- 4 References
- 5 External links
|
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
The Amendment was adopted following the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793). In Chisholm, the Court ruled that federal courts had the authority to hear cases in law and equity against states by private citizens, and that states did not enjoy sovereign immunity from suits made by citizens of other states. Thus, the Amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gave diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary to hear cases "between a state and citizens of another state."
Although the Amendment's text does not explicitly include suits brought by a citizen against his own state, the Supreme Court held, in Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890), that the Amendment reflects a broader principle of sovereign immunity. As Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for a five Justice majority, stated in Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999):
| “ |
[S]overeign immunity derives not from the Eleventh Amendment but from the structure of the original Constitution itself....Nor can we conclude that the specific Article I powers delegated to Congress necessarily include, by virtue of the Necessary and Proper Clause or otherwise, the incidental authority to subject the States to private suits as a means of achieving objectives otherwise within the scope of the enumerated powers.[1] |
” |
Writing for four dissenting Justices in Alden, Justice David Souter said the states surrendered their sovereign immunity when they ratified the Constitution. The dissenters read the Amendment's text as reflecting only a narrow form of sovereign immunity, limiting diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts, and the states are not insulated from suits by individuals by either the Eleventh Amendment in particular, or the Constitution in general.[2]
Although, the Eleventh Amendment immunizes non-consenting states from suit for money damages or equitable relief, federal courts may enjoin state officials from violating federal law under Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908). Furthermore, in Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 (1976), the Supreme Court held that the Congress, under its enforcement power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, may abrogate state immunity from suit. Also, in Central Virginia Community College v. Katz 546 U.S. 356 (2006), the Court held that the Congress could do the same regarding bankruptcy cases by way of Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution.
The Congress proposed the Eleventh Amendment on March 4, 1794.[3] The following states ratified the amendment:
- New York (March 27, 1794)
- Rhode Island (March 31, 1794)
- Connecticut (May 8, 1794)
- New Hampshire (June 16, 1794)
- Massachusetts (June 26, 1794)
- Vermont (November 9, 1794)
- Virginia (November 18, 1794)
- Georgia (November 29, 1794)
- Kentucky (December 7, 1794)
- Maryland (December 26, 1794)
- Delaware (January 23, 1795)
- North Carolina (February 7, 1795)
Ratification was completed on February 7, 1795. The amendment was subsequently ratified by South Carolina (December 4, 1797).
- ^ Opinion of the Court in Alden v. Maine
- ^ Dissenting opinion in Alden v. Maine
- ^ Mount, Steve (Jan 2007). "Ratification of Constitutional Amendments". Retrieved on Feb 24, 2007.
- National Archives: Eleventh Amendment
- CRS Annotated Constitution: Eleventh Amendment
|
United States Constitution |
|
| Text |
(at Wikisource): Preamble and Articles · Bill of Rights · Subsequent Amendments
|
|
| Formation |
History · Articles of Confederation · Mount Vernon Conference · Annapolis Convention · Philadelphia Convention · Virginia Plan · New Jersey Plan · Connecticut Compromise · Three-Fifths Compromise · Signatories · Federalist Papers (list) · Massachusetts Compromise
|
|
| Articles |
Preamble · One · Two · Three · Four · Five · Six · Seven
|
|
| Amendments |
Bill of Rights · Ratified · Proposed · Unsuccessful · Conventions to propose · State ratifying conventions
|
|
| Clauses |
Appointments · Appropriations · Case or Controversy · Citizenship · Commerce · Compact · Confrontation · Contract · Copyright and Patent · Due Process · Emolument · Equal Protection · Establishment · Exceptions · Ex post facto · Extradition · Free Exercise · Fugitive Slave · Full Faith and Credit · General Welfare · Guarantee · Impeachment · Militia · Natural–born citizen · Necessary-and-Proper · No Religious Test · Origination · Postal · Presentment · Privileges and Immunities · Privileges or Immunities · Speech or Debate · Supremacy · Suspension · Taxing and Spending · Territorial · Treaty · Trial by Jury · Vesting · War Powers
|
|
| Interpretation |
Theory · Concurrent powers · Congressional enforcement · Double jeopardy · Dormant Commerce Clause · Enumerated powers · Executive privilege · Incorporation of the Bill of Rights · Nondelegation doctrine · Preamble · Preemption · Separation of church and state · Separation of powers
|
|
|